Messages in this thread | | | From | <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting | Date | Wed, 7 Sep 2022 16:44:55 +0000 |
| |
On 07/09/2022 17:41, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:39:31PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: >> On 15/08/2022 23:14, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> Hey Will/Palmer/Sudeep, >>> >>> Catalin suggested [0] dropping the CC: stable for the arm64 patch and >>> instead making it a specific prereq of the RISC-V patch & making a PR, >>> so here we are.. I was still up when -rc1 came out so pushed it last >>> night to get the test coverage, but LKP seems to not have reported a >>> build success since early on the 13th so not holding my horses! I built >>> it again for both ARMs and RISC-V myself. >>> >>> I tagged it tonight, so it's on conor/linux.git as riscv-topo-on-6.0-rc1 >>> with the prereq specified. >>> >>> Not sure if you want to merge this too Sudeep or if that's up to Greg? >> >> What's the story with this from an arm64 & topology PoV? >> Palmer merged this into riscv/for-next a couple weeks ago, so just >> wondering what the craic is on the other fronts. > > If it's merged in the riscv tree, then I guess we don't need to do anything > on the arm64 side. It would be handy if it's on its own branch, however, > just in case we run into a conflict later on during the cycle.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/log/?h=arch-topo
FWIW it's here as 2 commits on top of v6.0-rc1
> > Catalin -- this is the series we spoke about the other day touching the > topology code. > > Cheers, > > Will > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
| |