lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: use update_mmu_tlb() on the second thread
From
On 30.09.22 10:43, Qi Zheng wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/9/30 16:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 29.09.22 13:23, Qi Zheng wrote:
>>> As message in commit 7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB
>>> if PTE entry exists") said, we should update local TLB only on the
>>> second thread. So in the do_anonymous_page() here, we should use
>>> update_mmu_tlb() instead of update_mmu_cache() on the second thread.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe mention here "This only affects performance, but not correctness."
>
> Oh, this is better. Hi Andrew, do I need to resend the v4?
>

I assume he can squash it, most probably no need to resend. :)

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-30 10:44    [W:0.229 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site