lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>
> On 9/1/22 1:25 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:39:55PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,1055 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I tried to fix SPDX-License-Identifier to GPL (same as MODULE_LICENSE
> below), However checkpatch.pl reports this as following warning:
>
> "WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL' is not supported in LICENSES/..."
>
> I see that GPL-1.0 is under LICENSE/deprecated directory.
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > > +
> > > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > There is a discrepency between the GPL-2.0 in the SPDS identifier and the above.
>
> Also, changing to MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2") gives following warning:
>
> WARNING: Prefer "GPL" over "GPL v2" - see commit bf7fbeeae6db ("module: Cure
> the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity")
> #1115: FILE: drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:1034:
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> So, It looks like SPDX-License-Identifier should be GPL-2.0-only and
> MODULE_LICENSE should be change to "GPL".

Commit bf7fbeeae6db is an interesting read - thanks for pointing it out.

>
> It this ok? Any other suggestions ?

What you have looks good, in that regard there is no need to change anything
from your patch.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Tanmay
>
> >
> > More comments tomorrow or Tuesday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-29 19:25    [W:0.259 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site