lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 5/7] arm: dts: qcom: mdm9615: remove invalid pmic subnodes compatibles
From
On 29/09/2022 14:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/09/2022 13:59, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> That's not really an answer... Bindings are correct because they are
>>> correct? What is exactly correct in the bindings? How they reflect the
>>> HW in a proper way, while DTS does not?
>>>
>>> Or let's focus on actual hardware - what are the properties of the
>>> hardware which indicate that DTS is wrong?
>>
>> The actual PMIC is an PM8018
>
> And DTS is saying PMIC is PM8018, isn't it? I see clearly in DTS:
> qcom,pm8018
> qcom,pm8018-rtc
> qcom,pm8018-pwrkey
> qcom,pm8018-gpio

And this is why I pushed the removal of qcom,pm8921* fallback compatibles,
except for qcom,pm8018-pwrkey because I didn't managed to get it documented at the time.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-29 14:22    [W:0.094 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site