Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:40:17 +0300 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pwm: core: Replace custom implementation of device_match_fwnode() |
| |
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:57:57PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:49:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:26:47PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 08:22:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Replace custom implementation of the device_match_fwnode(). > > > > > I really don't see the point in having an exported symbol for this. It's > > > a simple comparison and the result is even longer than the original. > > > > Longer doesn't always mean worse. > > > > > The > > > *only* reason why this helper exists seems to be because it is getting > > > used in *_find_device() callbacks. > > > > Yes and no. Initially for the purpose to be a callback it can be reused. > > The point is that it hides the dev_fwnode() machinery behind and taking > > into account ongoing discussion about constification of the dev_fwnode() > > we might need to touch this or similar places to avoid problems with > > compiler. > > Maybe next time use that argument in the commit message. That's much > more convincing than a useless "replace custom implementation" because > that just makes it look like you're doing this to pass the time or > something.
Noted.
> Applied, with a slightly updated commit message, thanks.
Thank you!
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |