| Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:54:47 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 03/27] kallsyms: add static relationship between `KSYM_NAME_LEN{,_BUFFER}` |
| |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:14:34PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > This adds a static assert to ensure `KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER` > gets updated when `KSYM_NAME_LEN` changes. > > The relationship used is one that keeps the new size (512+1) > close to the original buffer size (500). > > Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> > --- > scripts/kallsyms.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c > index 25e2fe5fbcd4..411ff5058b51 100644 > --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c > +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c > @@ -32,8 +32,18 @@ > > #define KSYM_NAME_LEN 128 > > -/* A substantially bigger size than the current maximum. */ > -#define KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER 499 > +/* > + * A substantially bigger size than the current maximum. > + * > + * It cannot be defined as an expression because it gets stringified > + * for the fscanf() format string. Therefore, a _Static_assert() is > + * used instead to maintain the relationship with KSYM_NAME_LEN. > + */ > +#define KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER 512 > +_Static_assert( > + KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER == KSYM_NAME_LEN * 4, > + "Please keep KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER in sync with KSYM_NAME_LEN" > +);
Messy, but I can't think of any other way right now either :(
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|