Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:29:45 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: add missing entries for gpio subnodes | From | Alexandre TORGUE <> |
| |
Hi Krzysztof
On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to >> fix dtb validation. > > Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of linaro ones. Sorry.
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml >> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml >> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties: >> '#gpio-cells': >> const: 2 >> >> + interrupt-controller: true >> + '#interrupt-cells': >> + const: 2 >> + >> reg: >> maxItems: 1 >> clocks: >> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties: >> minimum: 1 >> maximum: 16 >> >> + gpio-line-names: true > > maxItems?
Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all entries ?
For sure I'll send a v2 with it.
Alex
> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
| |