Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:26:21 +0800 | From | Tzung-Bi Shih <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm_ops instead of custom ops |
| |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:35:02PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > -static const struct dev_pm_ops mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops = { > - .poweroff = snd_soc_poweroff, > - .restore = snd_soc_resume, > -}; > - > static struct platform_driver mt8195_mt6359_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "mt8195_mt6359", > .of_match_table = mt8195_mt6359_dt_match, > - .pm = &mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops, > + .pm = &snd_soc_pm_ops,
snd_soc_pm_ops[1] sets some more fields. I'm not quite sure whether it would introduce any side effect or not. Perhaps Trevor could provide some suggestions.
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19.10/source/sound/soc/soc-core.c#L2150
| |