lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v5 03/30] KVM: x86: Move check_processor_compatibility from init ops to runtime ops
Date
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>

so that KVM can do compatibility checks on hotplugged CPUs. Drop __init
from check_processor_compatibility() and its callees.

use a static_call() to invoke .check_processor_compatibility.

Opportunistically rename {svm,vmx}_check_processor_compat to conform
to the naming convention of fields of kvm_x86_ops.

Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216031528.92558-2-chao.gao@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 14 +++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +--
5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
index 51f777071584..3bc45932e2d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP(msr_filter_changed)
KVM_X86_OP(complete_emulated_msr)
KVM_X86_OP(vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector)
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons);
+KVM_X86_OP(check_processor_compatibility)

#undef KVM_X86_OP
#undef KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 2c96c43c313a..5df5d88d345f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static inline u16 kvm_lapic_irq_dest_mode(bool dest_mode_logical)
struct kvm_x86_ops {
const char *name;

+ int (*check_processor_compatibility)(void);
int (*hardware_enable)(void);
void (*hardware_disable)(void);
void (*hardware_unsetup)(void);
@@ -1655,7 +1656,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_nested_ops {
struct kvm_x86_init_ops {
int (*cpu_has_kvm_support)(void);
int (*disabled_by_bios)(void);
- int (*check_processor_compatibility)(void);
int (*hardware_setup)(void);
unsigned int (*handle_intel_pt_intr)(void);

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index f3813dbacb9f..371300f03f55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4134,7 +4134,7 @@ svm_patch_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned char *hypercall)
hypercall[2] = 0xd9;
}

-static int __init svm_check_processor_compat(void)
+static int svm_check_processor_compatibility(void)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -4740,6 +4740,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
.name = "kvm_amd",

.hardware_unsetup = svm_hardware_unsetup,
+ .check_processor_compatibility = svm_check_processor_compatibility,
.hardware_enable = svm_hardware_enable,
.hardware_disable = svm_hardware_disable,
.has_emulated_msr = svm_has_emulated_msr,
@@ -5122,7 +5123,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_init_ops svm_init_ops __initdata = {
.cpu_has_kvm_support = has_svm,
.disabled_by_bios = is_disabled,
.hardware_setup = svm_hardware_setup,
- .check_processor_compatibility = svm_check_processor_compat,

.runtime_ops = &svm_x86_ops,
.pmu_ops = &amd_pmu_ops,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index c9b49a09e6b5..4ad058dc9794 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2494,8 +2494,8 @@ static bool cpu_has_sgx(void)
return cpuid_eax(0) >= 0x12 && (cpuid_eax(0x12) & BIT(0));
}

-static __init int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt,
- u32 msr, u32 *result)
+static int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt,
+ u32 msr, u32 *result)
{
u32 vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high;
u32 ctl = ctl_min | ctl_opt;
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ static __init int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt,
return 0;
}

-static __init u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr)
+static u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr)
{
u64 allowed;

@@ -2522,8 +2522,8 @@ static __init u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr)
return ctl_opt & allowed;
}

-static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
- struct vmx_capability *vmx_cap)
+static int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
+ struct vmx_capability *vmx_cap)
{
u32 vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high;
u32 min, opt, min2, opt2;
@@ -7416,7 +7416,7 @@ static int vmx_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm)
return 0;
}

-static int __init vmx_check_processor_compat(void)
+static int vmx_check_processor_compatibility(void)
{
struct vmcs_config vmcs_conf;
struct vmx_capability vmx_cap;
@@ -8014,6 +8014,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __initdata = {

.hardware_unsetup = vmx_hardware_unsetup,

+ .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compatibility,
.hardware_enable = vmx_hardware_enable,
.hardware_disable = vmx_hardware_disable,
.has_emulated_msr = vmx_has_emulated_msr,
@@ -8403,7 +8404,6 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
static struct kvm_x86_init_ops vmx_init_ops __initdata = {
.cpu_has_kvm_support = cpu_has_kvm_support,
.disabled_by_bios = vmx_disabled_by_bios,
- .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compat,
.hardware_setup = hardware_setup,
.handle_intel_pt_intr = NULL,

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7fc19533a484..34c7336ac581 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12031,7 +12031,6 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
- struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops = opaque;

WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());

@@ -12039,7 +12038,7 @@ int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *opaque)
__cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data))
return -EIO;

- return ops->check_processor_compatibility();
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility)();
}

bool kvm_vcpu_is_reset_bsp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-22 20:22    [W:0.228 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site