lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v4 2/7] acpi/x86: s2idle: If a new AMD _HID is missing assume Rembrandt
Date
A mistake was made that only AMDI0007 was set to rev of "2", but
it should have been also set for AMDI008. If an ID is missing from
the _HID table, then assume it matches Rembrandt behavior.

This implicitly means that if any other behavior changes happen
in the future missing IDs must be added to that table.

Tested-by: catalin@antebit.com
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> # GA402RJ
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v2->v3:
* Add tags
---
drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index 28a3ef9a6bc1..2c5931d247a2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
if (dev_id)
data = (const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *) dev_id->driver_data;
else
- return 0;
+ data = &amd_rembrandt;
rev_id = data->rev_id;
lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
--
2.34.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-21 22:41    [W:0.465 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site