Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:07:44 -0700 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] x86/sgx: Do not consider unsanitized pages an error | | From | Dave Hansen <> |
| |
On 8/25/22 01:08, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > However, if the SGX subsystem initialization is retracted, the sanitization > process could end up in the middle, and sgx_dirty_page_list be left > non-empty for legit reasons.
What does "retraction" mean in this context?
|  |