lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH][next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful" -> "successful"
From
On 17/08/2022 19:46, Mykola Lysenko wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Can you change patch title to "[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful” (kfunc_call.c)”?

Personally I think the kfunc_call.c part in the title is extraneous,
it's clear it's patching that file from the diff and it's not the style
I've used of the 3,900+ patches I've had accepted in the kernel.

Colin


>
> Regards,
> Mykola
>
>> On Aug 17, 2022, at 1:34 AM, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> This Message Is From an External Sender
>>
>> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>>
>> There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
>> index 351fafa006fb..eede7c304f86 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void test_destructive(void)
>> {
>> __u64 save_caps = 0;
>>
>> - ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "succesful_load");
>> + ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "successful_load");
>>
>> if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps"))
>> return;
>> --
>> 2.37.1
>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-17 21:03    [W:0.043 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site