Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:56:25 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" | From | Daniel Lezcano <> |
| |
Hi Ido,
On 15/08/2022 13:47, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c. >> >> As discussed in the thread: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/ >> >> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is >> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling >> device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless. >> >> No conflict happened when reverting the patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> > > Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of > your 6.1 pull request?
Yes, I told Vadim I prefer the change to go through my tree because it is part of a rework of the thermal core internals which impact more drivers.
> I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the > file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned, > but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev > maintainers.
Sure.
Dave, Eric,
Is that fine if the changes go through my tree ?
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |