Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 5.19 1009/1157] cifs: Fix memory leak when using fscache | Date | Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:06:05 +0200 |
| |
From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
[ Upstream commit c6f62f81b488d00afaa86bae26c6ce9ab12c709e ]
If we hit the 'index == next_cached' case, we leak a refcount on the struct page. Fix this by using readahead_folio() which takes care of the refcount for you.
Fixes: 0174ee9947bd ("cifs: Implement cache I/O by accessing the cache directly") Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- fs/cifs/file.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index e64cda7a7610..6985710e14c2 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -4459,10 +4459,10 @@ static void cifs_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl) * TODO: Send a whole batch of pages to be read * by the cache. */ - page = readahead_page(ractl); - last_batch_size = 1 << thp_order(page); + struct folio *folio = readahead_folio(ractl); + last_batch_size = folio_nr_pages(folio); if (cifs_readpage_from_fscache(ractl->mapping->host, - page) < 0) { + &folio->page) < 0) { /* * TODO: Deal with cache read failure * here, but for the moment, delegate @@ -4470,7 +4470,7 @@ static void cifs_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl) */ caching = false; } - unlock_page(page); + folio_unlock(folio); next_cached++; cache_nr_pages--; if (cache_nr_pages == 0) -- 2.35.1
| |