lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Do not virtualize MSR accesses for APIC LVTT register
From
Date
On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 22:34 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> AMD does not support APIC TSC-deadline timer mode. AVIC hardware
> will generate GP fault when guest kernel writes 1 to bits [18]
> of the APIC LVTT register (offset 0x32) to set the timer mode.
> (Note: bit 18 is reserved on AMD system).
>
> Therefore, always intercept and let KVM emulate the MSR accesses.
>
> Fixes: f3d7c8aa6882 ("KVM: SVM: Fix x2APIC MSRs interception")
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index aef63aae922d..3e0639a68385 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,14 @@ static const struct svm_direct_access_msrs {
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_ESR), .always = false },
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_ICR), .always = false },
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_ICR2), .always = false },
> - { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_LVTT), .always = false },
> +
> + /*
> + * Note:
> + * AMD does not virtualize APIC TSC-deadline timer mode, but it is
> + * emulated by KVM. When setting APIC LVTT (0x832) register bit 18,
> + * the AVIC hardware would generate GP fault. Therefore, always
> + * intercept the MSR 0x832, and do not setup direct_access_msr.
> + */
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_LVTTHMR), .always = false },
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_LVTPC), .always = false },
> { .index = X2APIC_MSR(APIC_LVT0), .always = false },


LVT is not something I would expect x2avic to even try to emulate, I would expect
it to dumbly forward the write to apic backing page (garbage in, garbage out) and then
signal trap vmexit?

I also think that regular AVIC works like that (just forwards the write to the page).

I am asking because there is a remote possibliity that due to some bug the guest got
direct access to x2apic registers of the host, and this is how you got that #GP.
Could you double check it?

We really need x2avic (and vNMI) spec to be published to know exactly how all of this
is supposed to work.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-28 09:39    [W:0.104 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site