Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:49 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings | From | Kent Overstreet <> |
| |
On 7/19/22 21:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:17:45 -0400 > Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> More specific please. >> >> Steve, look at the man page for snprintf if you don't see what I mean. >> This discussion has become entirely too tedious, and your _only_ >> contribution to the discussion on pretty-printers has been "why isn't >> this using this thing I made?". > > No, my response is, why should we replace something that is working > just fine? For you. For your code.
Look, Steve, I've tried to work with you. And I've given you reasons why seq_buf doesn't work for vsprintf.c, and more general cases. You have not responded _at all_ with technical reasons or discussion, all you've done from the very start is lecture me on process.
And, to be blunt, the time to have the printbuf vs. seq_buf discussion was months ago. I tried to start that discussion with you, and you ghosted on IRC when I started talking about the things in seq_buf that would have to change.
Like I said, I'll CC you when v5 is posted.
| |