Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:59:57 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,msm8996-apcc: Fix clocks | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 21/06/2022 19:28, Yassine Oudjana wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21 2022 at 20:07:50 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 19:07, Yassine Oudjana >> <yassine.oudjana@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com> >>> >>> The clocks currently listed in clocks and clock-names are the ones >>> supplied by this clock controller, not the ones it consumes. Replace >>> them with the only clock it consumes - the on-board oscillator (XO), >>> and make the properties required. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/clock/qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml | 15 >>> +++++++-------- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml >>> index a20cb10636dd..c4971234fef8 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml >>> @@ -26,22 +26,18 @@ properties: >>> >>> clocks: >>> items: >>> - - description: Primary PLL clock for power cluster (little) >>> - - description: Primary PLL clock for perf cluster (big) >>> - - description: Alternate PLL clock for power cluster (little) >>> - - description: Alternate PLL clock for perf cluster (big) >>> + - description: XO source >>> >>> clock-names: >>> items: >>> - - const: pwrcl_pll >>> - - const: perfcl_pll >>> - - const: pwrcl_alt_pll >>> - - const: perfcl_alt_pll >>> + - const: xo >>> >>> required: >>> - compatible >>> - reg >>> - '#clock-cells' >>> + - clocks >>> + - clock-names >> >> I think we can not list them as required, as then older DT files won't >> pass schema validation. But I'll leave this into the hands of Rob and >> Krzyshtof. > > The old DT files that didn't have XO defined had a wrong > compatible string to begin with (fixed in [1]), so I don't > think it's a problem. >
Reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |