lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] drm/msm/dp: Always clear mask bits to disable interrupts at dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl()
From

On 5/11/2022 2:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 12/05/2022 00:40, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>> dp_catalog_ctrl_reset() will software reset DP controller. But it will
>> not reset programmable registers to default value. DP driver still have
>> to clear mask bits to interrupt status registers to disable interrupts
>> after software reset of controller. This patch removes the enable flag
>> condition checking to always clear mask bits of interrupt status
>> registers to disable interrupts if enable flag is false.
>>
>> This patch also will fix the potential problem happen at system
>> suspend where
>> dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl() was called to try to disable HPD related
>> irqs but
>> the irq is still unmasked unexpectedly
>
> Why is it unmasked? Especially unexpectedly.

due to dp_catalog_ctrl_reset() does not clear hpd interrupt mask bits.

This is the problem this patch try to fix it.

I will revise commit text to explain more.

>
>> and can come in while system are
>> suspending. This leads to bus hangs if the irq is handled after we
>> power down
>> the DP hardware because we run the irq handler and access a device
>> register
>> assuming that no irq could ever come in if we powered down the
>> device. We
>> don't know when the irq will be handled though, so it's possible the
>> irq is
>> pending from before we disable the irq in the hardware.
>
> Please split into two patches.

this is just the same problem mention above.

>
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> -- add more details commit text
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> -- add synchrons_irq()
>> -- add atomic_t suspended
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> -- correct Fixes's commit ID
>>
>> Fixes: 989ebe7bc446 ("drm/msm/dp: do not initialize phy until plugin
>> interrupt received")
>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c    |  9 +++++++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
>> index af7a80c..f3e333e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
>> @@ -1389,8 +1389,13 @@ void dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(struct dp_ctrl
>> *dp_ctrl, bool enable)
>>         dp_catalog_ctrl_reset(ctrl->catalog);
>>   -    if (enable)
>> -        dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
>> +    /*
>> +     * all dp controller programmable registers will not
>> +     * be reset to default value after DP_SW_RESET
>> +     * therefore interrupt mask bits have to be updated
>> +     * to enable/disable interrupts
>> +     */
>> +    dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
>>   }
>>     void dp_ctrl_phy_init(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index c388323..c34dbfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct dp_display_private {
>>       struct dp_ctrl    *ctrl;
>>       struct dp_debug   *debug;
>>   +    atomic_t suspended;
>
> Usage of atomic_t signifies that something is wrong here. Bool should
> be enough here.

suspended flag are shared by both event_thread and display_irq_handler,
i think it need either atomic

or protected by spinlock.

>
>> +
>>       struct dp_usbpd_cb usbpd_cb;
>>       struct dp_display_mode dp_mode;
>>       struct msm_dp dp_display;
>> @@ -187,6 +189,11 @@ static int dp_add_event(struct
>> dp_display_private *dp_priv, u32 event,
>>       int pndx;
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&dp_priv->event_lock, flag);
>> +    if (atomic_read(&dp_priv->suspended)) {
>> +        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp_priv->event_lock, flag);
>> +        return -EPERM;
>
> Why EPERM?
>
>> +    }
>> +
>>       pndx = dp_priv->event_pndx + 1;
>>       pndx %= DP_EVENT_Q_MAX;
>>       if (pndx == dp_priv->event_gndx) {
>> @@ -454,6 +461,13 @@ static void dp_display_host_deinit(struct
>> dp_display_private *dp)
>>           dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
>>           dp->phy_initialized);
>>   +    if (!dp->core_initialized) {
>
> Can this happen?

not likely,

but It should not in this patch. will double check.

>
>> +        DRM_DEBUG_DP("DP core not initialized\n");
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    synchronize_irq(dp->irq);
>
> Why? If you need to run with IRQs disabled, you can use
> suspend_late/early_resume. But generally it should be enough to check
> for the !suspended in the IRQ.
>
>> +
>>       dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, false);
>>       dp_aux_deinit(dp->aux);
>>       dp_power_deinit(dp->power);
>> @@ -1362,6 +1376,8 @@ static int dp_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
>>           dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
>>           dp->phy_initialized, dp_display->power_on);
>>   +    atomic_set(&dp->suspended, 0);
>> +
>>       /* start from disconnected state */
>>       dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
>>   @@ -1431,6 +1447,8 @@ static int dp_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>           dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
>>           dp->phy_initialized, dp_display->power_on);
>>   +    atomic_inc(&dp->suspended);
>> +
>>       /* mainlink enabled */
>>       if (dp_power_clk_status(dp->power, DP_CTRL_PM))
>>           dp_ctrl_off_link_stream(dp->ctrl);
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-12 01:25    [W:0.039 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site