lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3] x86/fpu/xsave: Optimize XSAVEC/S when XGETBV1 is supported
From
On 4/22/22 12:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So I just go and add the XSAVEC support alone as that's actually
> something which _is_ beneficial for guests.

Yeah, agreed.

When I went to test these patches, a bit loop with XSAVEC was ~10%
faster that XSAVEOPT. This system has XSAVES, so wouldn't have been
using XSAVEOPT in the first place in the kernel. But, this is at least
one more data point in favor of XSAVEC.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-23 17:20    [W:0.320 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site