lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13
Date
Hi Brian,

On Freitag, 22. April 2022 19:08:53 CEST Brian Norris wrote:
> Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to
> hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that
> some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're
> still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit,
> JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host:
> 1. sets HS_TIMING
> 2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz")
> 3. sends further commands
>
> It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz
> frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it.
>
> The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although
> it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline,
> as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways:
>
> 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode
> switch")
>
> 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode
> for mmc")
>
> In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also
> apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too.
>
> Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet
> systems:
>
> [ 2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10
> [ 2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using
> ADMA [ 2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84
> [ 2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card
> [ 2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
> [ 2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
> [ 2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
> [ 2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
> [ 2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
> [ 2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
>
> Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early,
> which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for
> the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with
> JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz)
> rates first.
>
> Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed
> mode switch") Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when
> switching to HS mode for mmc") Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes
> frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es") Cc: Shawn Lin
> <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/
> Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

Verified on qcom-apq8026-lg-lenok which also showed the same error with the
last revision of this patch.

Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>

Regards
Luca

> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> * Revert to hs_max_dtr for HS200, due to issues reported by Luca Weiss
> <luca@z3ntu.xyz>; Luca, feel free to provide a "Tested-by: ..." reply
> if you'd like that included
> * Drop the "redundant clock rate" changes, as they aren't needed any
> more
>
> Changes in v3:
> * Use mmc_set_bus_speed() to help choose the right clock rate
> * Avoid redundant clock rate changes
> * Restore clock rate on failed HS200 switch
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Use ext_csd.hs200_max_dtr for HS200
> * Retest on top of 3b6c472822f8 ("mmc: core: Improve fallback to speed
> modes if eMMC HS200 fails")
>
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-04-23 16:42    [W:0.178 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site