Messages in this thread | | | From | "Alim Akhtar" <> | Subject | RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi compatible | Date | Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:49:29 +0530 |
| |
>-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@kernel.org] >Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 8:32 PM >To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> >Cc: 'Lee Jones' <lee.jones@linaro.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; >linus.walleij@linaro.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; >krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; >pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; andi@etezian.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; >linux-fsd@tesla.com; 'Adithya K V' <adithya.kv@samsung.com> >Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi >compatible > >On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:15:15PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > >> >There were changes adding the FSD SoC as well as DT stuff IIRC. > >> FSD SoC DT changes are already in -next. >> I think this can go with MFD tree because of immutable branch between >> MFD, SPI and DT due for the v5.18 merge windows. >> I am not sure if there are better ways to handle this. > >I need the changes that are hard dependencies to actually be in my tree so my >tree is not broken, -next isn't good enough here. If there are dependencies >for things you're posting you should explicitly say what they are when you >post (not just vauge statements that there are dependencies), and when you >post things that will be dependencies for other trees it's good to mention this >so that people can think about putting them on a separate branch for easier >cross merging. Sorry Mark for the noise. I should have clearly mentioned the dependencies. Surly I will keep this in mind for the future patches.
Only dependency these two patches have on
https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiYC7eYx2SpPILyl@google.com/
spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Convert to dtschema
which is now in MFD tree.
| |