lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: rt5759: Add support for Richtek RT5759 DCDC converter
From
On 25/03/2022 02:06, cy_huang wrote:
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>
> Add support for Richtek RT5759 high-performance DCDC converter.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/regulator/rt5759-regulator.c | 372 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/rt5759-regulator.c
>

(...)

> +static int rt5759_init_device_property(struct rt5759_priv *priv)
> +{
> + unsigned int val = 0;
> + bool wdt_enable;
> +
> + /*
> + * Only RT5759A support external watchdog input
> + */
> + if (priv->chip_type != CHIP_TYPE_RT5759A)
> + return 0;
> +
> + wdt_enable = device_property_read_bool(priv->dev,
> + "richtek,watchdog-enable");
> + if (wdt_enable)

No need for separate wdt_enable variable.

> + val = RT5759A_WDTEN_MASK;
> +
> + return regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, RT5759A_REG_WDTEN,
> + RT5759A_WDTEN_MASK, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int rt5759_manufacturer_check(struct rt5759_priv *priv)
> +{
> + unsigned int vendor;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, RT5759_REG_VENDORINFO, &vendor);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (vendor != RT5759_MANUFACTURER_ID) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "vendor info not correct (%d)\n", vendor);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool rt5759_is_accessible_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + struct rt5759_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (reg <= RT5759_REG_DCDCSET)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (priv->chip_type == CHIP_TYPE_RT5759A && reg == RT5759A_REG_WDTEN)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config rt5759_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .max_register = RT5759A_REG_WDTEN,
> + .readable_reg = rt5759_is_accessible_reg,
> + .writeable_reg = rt5759_is_accessible_reg,
> +};
> +
> +static int rt5759_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> +{
> + struct rt5759_priv *priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv->dev = &i2c->dev;
> + priv->chip_type = (unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(&i2c->dev);
> + i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, priv);
> +
> + priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &rt5759_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to allocate regmap (%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rt5759_manufacturer_check(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to check device (%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rt5759_init_device_property(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to init device (%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return rt5759_regulator_register(priv);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused rt5759_device_table[] = {

I don't think this can be __maybe_unused. It is always referenced via
of_match_table, isn't it?

> + { .compatible = "richtek,rt5759", .data = (void *)CHIP_TYPE_RT5759 },
> + { .compatible = "richtek,rt5759a", .data = (void *)CHIP_TYPE_RT5759A },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rt5759_device_table);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver rt5759_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "rt5759",
> + .of_match_table = rt5759_device_table,
> + },
> + .probe_new = rt5759_probe,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(rt5759_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Richtek RT5759 Regulator Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");


Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-25 13:17    [W:0.119 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site