lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] virt: acrn: fix a memory leak in acrn_dev_ioctl()
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 5:56 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:20:47PM +0800, Xiaolong Huang wrote:
> > The vm_param and cpu_regs need to be freed via kfree()
> > before return -EINVAL error.
> >
> > Fixes: 9c5137aedd11 ("virt: acrn: Introduce VM management interfaces")
> > Fixes: 2ad2aaee1bc9 ("virt: acrn: Introduce an ioctl to set vCPU registers state")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Huang <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fei Li <fei1.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
> > index 5419794fccf1..423ea888d79a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
> > @@ -136,8 +136,10 @@ static long acrn_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> > if (IS_ERR(vm_param))
> > return PTR_ERR(vm_param);
> >
> > - if ((vm_param->reserved0 | vm_param->reserved1) != 0)
> > + if ((vm_param->reserved0 | vm_param->reserved1) != 0) {
> > + kfree(vm_param);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > vm = acrn_vm_create(vm, vm_param);
> > if (!vm) {
> > @@ -182,21 +184,29 @@ static long acrn_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> > return PTR_ERR(cpu_regs);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_regs->reserved); i++)
> > - if (cpu_regs->reserved[i])
> > + if (cpu_regs->reserved[i]) {
> > + kfree(cpu_regs);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_32); i++)
> > - if (cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_32[i])
> > + if (cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_32[i]) {
> > + kfree(cpu_regs);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_64); i++)
> > - if (cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_64[i])
> > + if (cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.reserved_64[i]) {
> > + kfree(cpu_regs);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.gdt.reserved); i++)
> > if (cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.gdt.reserved[i] |
> > - cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.idt.reserved[i])
> > + cpu_regs->vcpu_regs.idt.reserved[i]) {
> > + kfree(cpu_regs);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > ret = hcall_set_vcpu_regs(vm->vmid, virt_to_phys(cpu_regs));
> > if (ret < 0)
> >
> > base-commit: 5859a2b1991101d6b978f3feb5325dad39421f29
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> How did you test this?

Ok, thanks. Firstly there is just some
parameter that should be freed before func returns the -EINVAL error
in the patch. I think it was correct, no need to test it. And
secondly the commitor
Li Fei1 also reviewed the patch code. finally I am sorry that no arcn
hso hardware to test it.

Regards,
butt3rflyh4ck.

--
Active Defense Lab of Venustech

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-15 09:04    [W:0.510 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site