Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:25:28 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] vDPA/ifcvf: match pointer check to use | From | "Zhu, Lingshan" <> |
| |
On 3/15/2022 11:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:03:26AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote: >> On 3/15/22 6:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 05:41:30AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: >>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >>>> >>>> Clang static analysis reports this issue >>>> ifcvf_main.c:49:4: warning: Called function >>>> pointer is null (null dereference) >>>> vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private); >>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> The check >>>> vring = &vf->vring[i]; >>>> if (vring->cb.callback) >>>> >>>> Does not match the use. Change dereference so they match. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 79333575b8bd ("vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature") >>> Thanks a lot! I squashed this into the offending patch - no point in >>> breaking bisect. Pushed to linux. However I'm now >>> having second thoughts about applying that patchset - I'd like >>> soma analysis explaining how this got through testing. >> static analysis is something i do treewide. >> >> There are currently ~2500 issues in linux-next, do not panic! many are false >> positives. >> >> It is pretty easy to setup and once you have a baseline you can filter only >> your files. >> >> Tom > Thanks for that info! I was actually directing this question to the > contributor since the code does not look like it could have ever > worked. I don't have the hardware in question myself. Oh, that's my bad introducing this bug by typo, thanks Tom for fixing that! In my previous testing, I tolerated the lower performance(only one queue working as you pointed out) due to the shared irq, and did not check mq status, sorry for that.
After fixing this issue, test again:
(1)set nvectors = 2 after allocate MSI vectors, force the queues share one vector. from /proc/interrupts, we can see: [lszhu@localhost linux]$ cat /proc/interrupts | grep ifcvf 241: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2724424 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI 534528-edge ifcvf[0000:01:00.5]-vqs-reused-irq 242: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI 534529-edge ifcvf[0000:01:00.5]-config 251: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2693318 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI 536576-edge ifcvf[0000:01:00.6]-vqs-reused-irq 252: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI 536577-edge ifcvf[0000:01:00.6]-config
(2) after several rounds of scp from a VF to another, at the source side, ethtool -S shows(cut off, only tx): localhost:/home/lszhu # ethtool -S eth1 NIC statistics: tx_queue_0_packets: 437256 tx_queue_0_bytes: 629246017 tx_queue_0_xdp_tx: 0 tx_queue_0_xdp_tx_drops: 0 tx_queue_0_kicks: 34089 tx_queue_1_packets: 73 tx_queue_1_bytes: 96721 tx_queue_1_xdp_tx: 0 tx_queue_1_xdp_tx_drops: 0 tx_queue_1_kicks: 12 tx_queue_2_packets: 294647 tx_queue_2_bytes: 433949815 tx_queue_2_xdp_tx: 0 tx_queue_2_xdp_tx_drops: 0 tx_queue_2_kicks: 14948 tx_queue_3_packets: 20226451 tx_queue_3_bytes: 29735633548 tx_queue_3_xdp_tx: 0 tx_queue_3_xdp_tx_drops: 0 tx_queue_3_kicks: 1123675
so every queue carries traffic now, all enabled
Thanks, Zhu Lingshan
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> index 3b48e717e89f7..4366320fb68d3 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vqs_reused_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg) >>>> for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { >>>> vring = &vf->vring[i]; >>>> if (vring->cb.callback) >>>> - vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private); >>>> + vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private); >>>> } >>>> return IRQ_HANDLED; >>>> -- >>>> 2.26.3
| |