lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mmc: mmci: manage MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER per variant config
From
On 3/14/22 14:05, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Yann,
>
> On Mo, 2022-03-14 at 13:55 +0100, Yann Gautier wrote:
>> Add a disable_keep_power field in variant_data struct. The
>> MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER flag will be enabled if disable_keep_power is not
>> set.
>> It is only set to true for stm32_sdmmc variants.
>>
>> The issue was seen on STM32MP157C-DK2 board, which embeds a wifi
>> chip.
>> It doesn't correctly support low power on this board. The Wifi chip
>> awaits an always-on regulator, but it was connected to v3v3 which is
>> off
>> in low-power sequence. MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER should then be disabled.
>>
>> The flag can still be enabled through DT property:
>> keep-power-in-suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> Update in v2:
>> Reword commit message to better explain the issue.
>>
>> Resend the patch alone. It was previoulsy in a series [1] for which
>> the
>> other patches will be reworked.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220304135134.47827-1-yann.gautier@foss.st.com/
>>
>>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 5 ++++-
>>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> index 45b8608c935c..0e2f2f5d6a52 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static struct variant_data variant_stm32_sdmmc =
>> {
>>         .busy_detect            = true,
>>         .busy_detect_flag       = MCI_STM32_BUSYD0,
>>         .busy_detect_mask       = MCI_STM32_BUSYD0ENDMASK,
>> +       .disable_keep_power     = true,
>>         .init                   = sdmmc_variant_init,
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ static struct variant_data variant_stm32_sdmmcv2
>> = {
>>         .busy_detect            = true,
>>         .busy_detect_flag       = MCI_STM32_BUSYD0,
>>         .busy_detect_mask       = MCI_STM32_BUSYD0ENDMASK,
>> +       .disable_keep_power     = true,
>>         .init                   = sdmmc_variant_init,
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -2172,7 +2174,8 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
>>         host->stop_abort.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
>>
>>         /* We support these PM capabilities. */
>> -       mmc->pm_caps |= MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>> +       if (!variant->disable_keep_power)
>> +               mmc->pm_caps |= MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>>
>>         /*
>>          * We can do SGIO
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
>> index e1a9b96a3396..2cad1ef9766a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
>> @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ struct variant_data {
>>         u32                     opendrain;
>>         u8                      dma_lli:1;
>>         u32                     stm32_idmabsize_mask;
>> +       u8                      disable_keep_power:1;
>
> There are already four separate bitfields in struct variant_data, why
> not move this up into one of them?
>
> regards
> Philipp

Hi Philipp,

You're right, I'll put it with the previous bitfiled in v3.

Best regards,
Yann

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-03-14 14:46    [W:0.102 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site