lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: clps711x: Terminate clk_div_table with sentinel element
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 01:13:00PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/2/22 01:52, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> > In order that the end of a clk_div_table can be detected, it must be
> > terminated with a sentinel element (.div = 0).
> >
> > Fixes: 631c53478973d ("clk: Add CLPS711X clk driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> > ---
> >
> > v3:
> > - no changes
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add Fixes tag
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk-clps711x.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-clps711x.c b/drivers/clk/clk-clps711x.c
> > index a2c6486ef1708..d96d96c8752c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-clps711x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-clps711x.c
> > @@ -28,11 +28,13 @@ static const struct clk_div_table spi_div_table[] = {
> > { .val = 1, .div = 8, },
> > { .val = 2, .div = 2, },
> > { .val = 3, .div = 1, },
> > + {}
>
> Why not use the same style on all patches? Others developers looking
> at this code will directly grab this is a sentinel section, instead of
> wondering why this empty section is here.
>
> { /* sentinel */ }

I found the {} style sufficient.
But ok, I'll go with { /* sentinel */ } now.

>
> Anyhow the patch logic is correct, so:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

Thanks!

Jonathan
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-05 14:09    [W:0.040 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site