lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 08/23] KVM: MMU: rephrase unclear comment
Date
If accessed bits are not supported there simple isn't any distinction
between accessed and non-accessed gPTEs, so the comment does not make
much sense. Rephrase it in terms of what happens if accessed bits
*are* supported.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 5b5bdac97c7b..6bb9a377bf89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!FNAME(is_present_gpte)(gpte))
goto no_present;

- /* if accessed bit is not supported prefetch non accessed gpte */
+ /* if accessed bit is supported, prefetch only accessed gpte */
if (PT_HAVE_ACCESSED_DIRTY(vcpu->arch.mmu) &&
!(gpte & PT_GUEST_ACCESSED_MASK))
goto no_present;
--
2.31.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-02-04 12:58    [W:0.288 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site