Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Provide and use generic_handle_irq_safe() where appropriate. | Date | Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:57:29 +0100 |
| |
Lee,
On Tue, Feb 15 2022 at 15:42, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> Either way it remains bisect-able since each driver is changed >> individually. There is no need to merge them in one go but since it is >> that small it probably makes sense. But I don't do the logistics here. > > Okay, this is what I was asking. > > So there aren't any hard dependencies between the driver changes? > > Only the drivers are dependent on the API.
Correct.
> So, if we choose to do so, we can merge the API and then subsequently > add the users one by one into their respective subsystem, in any > order. This would save on creating an immutable topic branch which we > all pull from. > > What is your preference Thomas?
I suggest doing it the following way:
1) I apply 1/7 on top of -rc5 and tag it
2) Driver maintainers who want to merge via their trees pull that tag apply the relevant driver changes
3) I collect the leftovers and merge them via irq/core
Does that make sense?
Thanks,
tglx
| |