lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf/docs: Document struct task_struct * kfuncs
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 10:10:14AM -0600, David Vernet wrote:
> > > +.. code-block:: c
> > > +
> > > + SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
> > > + int BPF_PROG(task_get_pid_example, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
> > > + {
> > > + struct task_struct *lookup;
> > > +
> > > + lookup = bpf_task_from_pid(task->pid);
> > > + if (!lookup)
> > > + /* A task should always be found, as %task is a tracepoint arg. */
> > > + return -ENOENT;
> > > +
> > > + if (lookup->pid != task->pid) {
> > > + /* The pid of the lookup task should be the same as the input task. */
> >
> > I suspect both "errors" are actually possible in practice,
> > since bpf_task_from_pid is using init_pid_ns.
> > But this taskd might be in different pid_ns. See task_active_pid_ns.
> > Probably worth mentioning this aspect of bpf_task_from_pid.
>
> Yep, agreed. Will add

Actually, I don't think either error can ever happen. p->pid is globally
unique, and always uses the init_pid_ns. See [0] where p->pid is set,
and [1] for the implementation of pid_nr(). So I think the existing
example is actually correct, though I'll still add some comments to
explain that the kfunc only works for p->pid / the init_pid_ns.

[0]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/kernel/fork.c#n2326
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/include/linux/pid.h#n181

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-05 21:59    [W:0.078 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site