lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 04/14] sound: usb: card: Introduce USB SND vendor op callbacks
From
On 27/12/2022 23:07, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 12/24/2022 3:03 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 at 01:33, Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Allow for different vendors to be notified on USB SND connect/disconnect
>>> seqeunces.  This allows for vendor USB SND modules to properly
>>> initialize
>>> and populate internal structures with references to the USB SND chip
>>> device.
>>
>> The commit message definitely needs some improvement. We do not notify
>> vendors on SND connect/disconnect events.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   sound/usb/card.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   sound/usb/card.h |  7 +++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c
>>> index 26268ffb8274..212f55a7683c 100644
>>> --- a/sound/usb/card.c
>>> +++ b/sound/usb/card.c
>>> @@ -117,6 +117,21 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(skip_validation, "Skip unit
>>> descriptor validation (default: no)
>>>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(register_mutex);
>>>   static struct snd_usb_audio *usb_chip[SNDRV_CARDS];
>>>   static struct usb_driver usb_audio_driver;
>>> +static struct snd_usb_vendor_ops *vendor_ops;
>>> +
>>> +int snd_usb_register_vendor_ops(struct snd_usb_vendor_ops *ops)
>>
>> platform ops?
>>
>
> Will change it.
>
>>> +{
>>> +       vendor_ops = ops;
>>> +       return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_usb_register_vendor_ops);
>>
>> What happens if several platforms try to register different ops? I saw
>> from the patch 09/14 that you register these ops unconditionally. If
>> other devices follow your approach there is an obvious conflict.
>>
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> That is true.  I don't think there is a proper need to have multiple
> vendor ops being registered, so maybe just returning an error for if ops
> are already registered is sufficient.

This would be a required step. And also you have to check the running
platform before registering your ops unconditionally. Ideally this
should be done as a part of the device's driver, so that we can control
registration of the platform ops using the usual interface.

>
> Thanks
> Wesley Cheng

--
With best wishes
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:21    [W:0.070 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site