Lähetetty iPhonesta

> Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> kirjoitti 24.12.2022 kello 20.30:
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Lähetetty iPhonesta
>> 
>>> Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> kirjoitti 23.12.2022 kello 11.54:
>>> 
>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>> head:   f9ff5644bcc04221bae56f922122f2b7f5d24d62
>>> commit: 5134272f9f3f71d4e1f3aa15cb09321af49b3646 gpio: exar: access MPIO registers on cascaded chips
>>> config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20221218
>>> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>> 
>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>>> 
>>> smatch warnings:
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c:52 exar_offset_to_sel_addr() warn: replace divide condition 'pin / 8' with 'pin >= 8'
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c:62 exar_offset_to_lvl_addr() warn: replace divide condition 'pin / 8' with 'pin >= 8'
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I don’t think this is a good advice. If we want to limit that, we need
>> to check also upper limit. But. The GPIO framework does that. So,
>> changing / to >= is bogus.
> 
> 
> How is checking pin / 8 not mathematically equivalent to pin >= 8?

The point is that semantically the / is better in case this code will ever support more than two banks of pins.


> I don't understand this code at all.  The divide is inscrutable  Is it
> storing something in in the lower 3 bits and something in bit 4?  In
> that case it might be nicer to just check (pin & BIT(4)).
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> vim +52 drivers/gpio/gpio-exar.c
>>> 
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  47  static unsigned int
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  48  exar_offset_to_sel_addr(struct exar_gpio_chip *exar_gpio, unsigned int offset)
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  49  {
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  50      unsigned int pin = exar_gpio->first_pin + (offset % 16);
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  51      unsigned int cascaded = offset / 16;
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02 @52      unsigned int addr = pin / 8 ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO;
>>> 
>>> Why not change this to pin > 8 instead.  Comparisons are faster than
>>> divide ops.  Way more readable too.
>>> 
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  53  
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  54      return addr + (cascaded ? exar_gpio->cascaded_offset : 0);
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  55  }
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  56  
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  57  static unsigned int
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  58  exar_offset_to_lvl_addr(struct exar_gpio_chip *exar_gpio, unsigned int offset)
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  59  {
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  60      unsigned int pin = exar_gpio->first_pin + (offset % 16);
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  61      unsigned int cascaded = offset / 16;
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02 @62      unsigned int addr = pin / 8 ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO;
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  63  
>>> 5134272f9f3f71 Qingtao Cao         2022-09-02  64      return addr + (cascaded ? exar_gpio->cascaded_offset : 0);
>>> 696868d0a79c21 Bartosz Golaszewski 2020-09-30  65  }
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>>> https://01.org/lkp
>>>