[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] i2c: designware: Fix unbalanced suspended flag
On 12/19/22 15:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:01:45PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>> Ensure that i2c_mark_adapter_suspended() is always balanced by a call to
>> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed().
>> dw_i2c_plat_resume() must always be called, so that
>> i2c_mark_adapter_resumed() is called. This is not compatible with
>> DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME, so remove the flag.
>> Since the controller is always resumed on system resume the
>> dw_i2c_plat_complete() callback is redundant and has been removed.
>> The unbalanced suspended flag was introduced by commit c57813b8b288
>> ("i2c: designware: Lock the adapter while setting the suspended flag")
>> Before that commit, the system and runtime PM used the same functions. The
>> DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME was used to skip the system resume if the driver
>> had been in runtime-suspend. If system resume was skipped, the suspended
>> flag would be cleared by the next runtime resume. The check of the
>> suspended flag was _after_ the call to pm_runtime_get_sync() in
>> i2c_dw_xfer(). So either a system resume or a runtime resume would clear
>> the flag before it was checked.
>> Having introduced the unbalanced suspended flag with that commit, a further
>> commit 80704a84a9f8
>> ("i2c: designware: Use the i2c_mark_adapter_suspended/resumed() helpers")
> This is still unwrapped propertly, but no need to resend, it so minor, really.
> Just a hint for the future submissions.
This version was working on those two machines that saw a regression
with v2 so

Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-19 16:02    [W:0.046 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site