lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: designware: set pinctrl recovery information from device pinctrl
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:15:35AM +0200, Hawa, Hanna wrote:
> On 12/14/2022 6:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > + if (dev->dev->pins && dev->dev->pins->p)
> > > + rinfo->pinctrl = dev->dev->pins->p;
> > Hmm... I don't see how this field is being used.
> > Can you elaborate?
>
> This field is used in i2c_generic_scl_recovery(), if it's not NULL then the
> flow will set the state to GPIO before running the recovery mechanism.
> if (bri->pinctrl)
> pinctrl_select_state(bri->pinctrl, bri->pins_gpio);

OK, but why that function doesn't use the dev->pins->p if it's defined?
(As a fallback when rinfo->pinctrl is NULL.)

Wolfram?

Hanna, it seems you missed I²C maintainer to Cc...

...

> I saw that that the change failed in complication for SPARC architecture, as
> the pins field is wraparound with CONFIG_PINCTRL in device struct. I though
> on two options to solve the compilation error, first by adding wraparound of
> CONFIG_PINCTRL when accessing the pins field. And the second option is to
> add get function in pinctrl/devinfo.h file, which return the pins field, or
> NULL in case the PINCTRL is not defined. Which option you think we can go
> with?

Getter with a stub sounds better to me, so you won't access some device core
fields.

Linus, what do you think about all these (including previous paragraph)?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-15 11:29    [W:0.067 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site