lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Revert "phy: qualcomm: usb28nm: Add MDM9607 init sequence"
From
On 14/12/2022 22:37, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> This reverts commit 557a28811c7e0286d3816842032db5eb7bb5f156.
>
> This commit introduced an init sequence from downstream DT [1] in the
> driver. As mentioned by the comment above the HSPHY_INIT_CFG macro for
> this sequence:
>
> /*
> * The macro is used to define an initialization sequence. Each tuple
> * is meant to program 'value' into phy register at 'offset' with 'delay'
> * in us followed.
> */
>
> Instead of corresponding to offsets into the phy register, the sequence
> read by the downstream driver [2] is passed into ulpi_write [3] which
> crafts the address-value pair into a new value and writes it into the
> same register at USB_ULPI_VIEWPORT [4]. In other words, this init
> sequence is programmed into the hardware in a totally different way than
> downstream and is unlikely to achieve the desired result, if the hsphy
> is working at all.
>
> An alternative method needs to be found to write these init values at
> the desired location. Fortunately mdm9607 did not land upstream yet [5]
> and should have its compatible revised to use the generic one, instead
> of a compatible that writes wrong data to the wrong registers.
>
> [1]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/mdm9607.dtsi#585
> [2]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c#4183
> [3]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c#468
> [4]: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c#418
> [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210805222812.40731-1-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/
>
> Reported-by: Michael Srba <Michael.Srba@seznam.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>

Hmm.

I got a bit concerned qcs405 was broken too, which would be worrying
since I remember testing this code, though not specifically turning off
the PHY init, then again, there's a near zero chance the USB PHY would
work after reset without the specified init seq.

The original upstreamed code for qcs404/405

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/refs/heads/android-msm-coral-4.14-android10/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs405-usb.dtsi

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/refs/heads/android-msm-coral-4.14-android10/drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-snps-28nm-hs.c

Does a relative write to an offset of the PHY CSR

CSR base is 0x7a000
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/refs/heads/android-msm-coral-4.14-android10/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs405-usb.dtsi#74

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/refs/heads/android-msm-coral-4.14-android10/drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-snps-28nm-hs.c#285

which will result in 0x7a000 + 0xc0 = 0x01, etc

which for us upstream then is

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi#L336

and

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-hs-28nm.c#L388

Writing 0x7a000 + 0xc0 = 0x01, etc - a writel() in this case

so that bit is fine.

mdm9607

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/mdm9607.dtsi#569
- compat string is

CSR is @ 0x6c000

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c#664

downstream PHY init seq

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/mdm9607.dtsi#585

and downstream driver PHY init write

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c#664

Which does

writel_relaxed(ULPI_RUN | ULPI_WRITE |
ULPI_ADDR(reg) | ULPI_DATA(val),
USB_ULPI_VIEWPORT);

Yep, you're right, we can't do a simple writeb(csr + reg, val); for
mdm9607 but, also the qcs404 => compat = "qcom,usb-hs-28nm-femtophy" is
doing the right thing.

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-12-15 02:52    [W:0.095 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site