Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:14:18 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce a carveout for modem metadata | From | Sibi Sankar <> |
| |
On 12/14/22 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/12/2022 15:07, Sibi Sankar wrote: >> Introduce a new carveout for modem metadata. This will serve as a >> replacement for the memory region used by MSA to authenticate modem >> ELF headers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 7 ++++++- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor.dtsi | 7 ++++++- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-lte-sku.dtsi | 7 ++++++- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >> 7 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi >> index 5b47b8de69da..4242f8587c19 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-common.dtsi >> @@ -127,6 +127,12 @@ >> reg = <0x0 0xf6f00000 0x0 0x100000>; >> no-map; >> }; >> + >> + /delete-node/ memory@91700000; >> + mdata_mem: memory@f7100000 { >> + reg = <0x0 0xf7100000 0x0 0x4000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> }; >> >> vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator { >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi >> index cc65f52bb80f..3f5fb08e2341 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi >> @@ -462,6 +462,11 @@ >> reg = <0x0 0x91500000 0x0 0x200000>; >> no-map; >> }; >> + >> + mdata_mem: memory@91700000 { >> + reg = <0x0 0x91700000 0x0 0x4000>; >> + no-map; >> + }; >> }; >> >> rpm-glink { >> @@ -2458,6 +2463,10 @@ >> memory-region = <&mpss_mem>; >> }; >> >> + metadata { > > Does it pass dtbs_check?
^^ portion of the bindings aren't in yaml yet please see patch 3.
> > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
| |