Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andrew Cooper <> | | Subject | Re: strange behavior with sigreturn() to 32bit | | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:38:04 +0000 |
| |
On 13/12/2022 00:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10 2022 at 14:08, stsp wrote: > > Can you please Cc LKML on such mails? x86_64@vger.kernel.org is not used > by any x86 maintainer as you can figure out from looking at the > MAINTAINERS file in the kernel. > >> I am playing with 32bit compatibility segments, and I am observing >> something very strange. To demonstrate the problem, I did the change >> to the kernel sigreturn test-case, and it is attached. The change >> just moves the magic value to EAX and calls an interrupt that produces >> a SIGSEGV. The SIGSEGV handler prints the needed regs. This patch >> intentionally adds 0x100000000 to the RIP register, because AFAIK the >> high part or 64bit regs are irrelevant in compatibility mode. >> >> Now with high part of RIP non-zero, we see this: >> $ ./sigreturn_64 >> err=0 trapno=d ax=0 ip=100000003 > I just applied the patch and on a 6.1 kernel I get: > > # ./sigreturn_64 > [OK] set_thread_area refused 16-bit data > [OK] set_thread_area refused 16-bit data > [RUN] Valid sigreturn: 64-bit CS (33), 32-bit SS (2b, GDT) > [OK] all registers okay > [RUN] Valid sigreturn: 32-bit CS (23), 32-bit SS (2b, GDT) > [NOTE] SP: 8badf00d5aadc0de -> 5aadc0de > [OK] all registers okay > [RUN] Valid sigreturn: 16-bit CS (37), 32-bit SS (2b, GDT) > > err=0 trapno=d ax=a5f3 ip=6 > > Let's look at the disassmbly: > > 0000000000403000 <int3>: > 403000: 8c d1 mov %ss,%ecx > 403002: cc int3 > > 0000000000403003 <int31>: > 403003: b8 f3 a5 00 00 mov $0xa5f3,%eax > 403008: cd 31 int $0x31 > > which is expected and correct: > > trapno = 0xd = 13 = #GP > ax = the magic value > ip = 6 (Offset to the 'int3:' label in the 16bit CS) > err = 0 > > Both 'ip' and 'err' are completely correct here. Why? > > The #GP's on 403006. Because in 16bit mode the CPU the disassmbly looks > like this: > > 403003: b8 f3 a5 mov $0xa5f3,%eax > 403006: 00 00 add %al, (%bx, %si)
That's `mov $0xa5f3,%ax` rather than %eax, but otherwise yes.
~Andrew
> > so 403006 which is offset 6 into the 16bit CS translates to: > > bx[si] += al; > > so in my case: > > bx=0x0 si=0x2903e6d0 > > which is clearly outside of the DS segment limit resulting in a #GP with > error code == 0. > > Your observation that running this under GDB changes the behaviour of > the error is completely correct because BX/SI are subject to context. So > depending where the combo points to it results in random behaviour. > > So nothing strange to see here, really. You got what you asked for: > >> I am playing with .... > Thanks, > > tglx
|  |