Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:04:57 -0500 | From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] bna: Avoid clashing function prototypes |
| |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:12:26AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:20:47PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > When built with Control Flow Integrity, function prototypes between > > caller and function declaration must match. These mismatches are visible > > at compile time with the new -Wcast-function-type-strict in Clang[1]. > > > > Fix a total of 227 warnings like these: > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bna_enet.c:519:3: warning: cast from 'void (*)(struct bna_ethport *, enum bna_ethport_event)' to 'bfa_fsm_t' (aka 'void (*)(void *, int)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] > > bfa_fsm_set_state(ethport, bna_ethport_sm_down); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > The bna state machine code heavily overloads its state machine functions, > > so these have been separated into their own sets of structs, enums, > > typedefs, and helper functions. There are almost zero binary code changes, > > all seem to be related to header file line numbers changing, or the > > addition of the new stats helper. > > This looks like it borrowed from > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20220929230334.2109344-1-keescook@chromium.org/ > Nice to get a couple hundred more fixed. :)
Yep; you're right. That's exactly the patch I was staring at while doing these changes. :)
> > > [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D134831 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - None. This patch is new in the series. > > This is relatively stand-alone (not an iw_handler patch), so it could > also go separately too.
My criteria here was that all these patches avoid clashing function prototypes. So, they could be put together into a series, regardless if they are "iw_handler" related patches.
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thanks! -- Gustavo
| |