lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: pi433: move get version func to where all other functions are
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> > @@ -1116,9 +1116,7 @@ static int pi433_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > spi->mode, spi->bits_per_word, spi->max_speed_hz);
> >
> > /* Ping the chip by reading the version register */
> > - retval = spi_w8r8(spi, 0x10);
> > - if (retval < 0)
> > - return retval;
> > + retval = rf69_get_chip_version(spi);
>
> This can not fail anymore, like it used to be able to. So I think you
> just broke the functionality for why this call was being made in the
> first place (i.e. ping the chip to see if it was alive, and fail if it
> is not.)
>

I thought that this if statement was somewhat redudant because right
after obtaining the chip version, there is a switch statement that
checks if the value is what we expect or return an error otherwise.

Unfortunately, in the patch file generated the whole switch statement
isn't visible so I admit that it looks funny at first. I will paste the
routine here:

/* Ping the chip by reading the version register */
retval = rf69_get_chip_version(spi);

switch (retval) {
case 0x24:
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "found pi433 (ver. 0x%x)", retval);
break;
default:
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "unknown chip version: 0x%x", retval);
return -ENODEV;
}

Let me know if you agree with the approach I've taken, otherwise I am
more than happy to add the original if statement if you think I'm
missing any edge case here.

Once again, thanks for taking the time to review my patch :)

thanks,

Paulo A.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-06 22:01    [W:0.071 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site