Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:49:48 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulators: Add bindings for Maxim MAX20086-MAX20089 |
| |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:26:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:11:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > + required: > > > + - OUT1 > > > + - OUT2
> > Why are we requiring that there be machine constraints for the > > individual regulators? There's already a problem with people just > > using the maximum possible control a regulator has as the default for > > devices without regard to what the specific system can support.
> Could you elaborate a bit, keeping in mind that I'm a newbie when it > comes to the regulator framework ? :-)
Not really... the question is why we are marking these as required rather than just letting them be omitted as we normally do for individual regulators on a device. What purpose does it serve?
> How should I modify the DT bindings to match that correctly ?
Remove the required:. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |