lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulators: Add bindings for Maxim MAX20086-MAX20089
    On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:26:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
    > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 11:11:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

    > > > + required:
    > > > + - OUT1
    > > > + - OUT2

    > > Why are we requiring that there be machine constraints for the
    > > individual regulators? There's already a problem with people just
    > > using the maximum possible control a regulator has as the default for
    > > devices without regard to what the specific system can support.

    > Could you elaborate a bit, keeping in mind that I'm a newbie when it
    > comes to the regulator framework ? :-)

    Not really... the question is why we are marking these as required
    rather than just letting them be omitted as we normally do for
    individual regulators on a device. What purpose does it serve?

    > How should I modify the DT bindings to match that correctly ?

    Remove the required:.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-01-04 15:50    [W:3.218 / U:0.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site