Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pps: clients: gpio: Propagate return value from pps_gpio_probe | From | Rodolfo Giometti <> | Date | Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:35:17 +0100 |
| |
On 29/01/22 23:02, Robert Hancock wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 09:17 +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: >> On 12/01/22 22:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 02:52:14PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: >>>> If the pps-gpio driver was probed prior to the GPIO device it uses, the >>>> devm_gpiod_get call returned an -EPROBE_DEFER error, but pps_gpio_probe >>>> replaced that error code with -EINVAL, causing the pps-gpio probe to >>>> fail and not be retried later. Propagate the error return value so that >>>> deferred probe works properly. >>> >>> FWIW, >>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >> >> Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> > > It's not entirely clear to me what tree PPS patches are supposed to go through. > Seems like some recent ones have gone through char-misc? Not sure if someone > has this in their queue?
LinuxPPS has no its own tree. All related patches usually are sent to me to be acked and to Greg Kroah-Hartman for inclusion.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
-- GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127 UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
| |