lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 11/23] ima: Move ima_lsm_policy_notifier into ima_namespace
From

On 1/26/22 08:05, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:46:33PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Move the ima_lsm_policy_notifier into the ima_namespace. Each IMA
>> namespace can now register its own LSM policy change notifier callback.
>> The policy change notifier for the init_ima_ns still remains in init_ima()
>> and therefore handle the registration of the callback for all other
>> namespaces in init_ima_namespace().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
> I'd double-check that this cannot be used to cause rcu stalls when a lot
> of ima namespace with a lot of rules are used leading to a dos situation
> during LSM policy update. The good thing at least is that an LSM policy
> update can only be triggered for selinux for the whole system.


I just ran a test with up to 1920 IMA-namespaces each with 2 audit rules
with the vmtools_exec_t label. Disabling of the vmtools SELinux module
caused the rules to disappear in all IMA namespaces, as expected.
However, it also added many kernel log lines 'ima: rule for LSM
'vmtools_exec_t' is undefined' to the kernel log that should probably be
suppressed for ns != &init_ima_ns. Nothing bad happened otherwise. Also
re-enabling the vmtools module didn't cause any kernel errors.  So I
think we should be fine.

https://github.com/stefanberger/ima-namespaces-tests/tree/master/audit-many-2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-26 22:55    [W:0.105 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site