lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] HID: google: modify HID device groups of eel
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 02:55:49PM -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry Torokhov (2022-01-14 11:59:50)
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:25:12PM -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > My understanding is that 'vivaldi' is mostly a keyboard layout and
> > > 'hammer' is a detachable keyboard. We want to prevent the hid-vivaldi
> > > driver from probing this particular device because the hid-vivaldi
> > > driver doesn't know about detachable keyboards. Hammer devices also
> > > support 360 degree wraparound so we know that the keyboard has been put
> > > behind the screen or that it's being used to stand up the device on a
> > > table.
> > >
> > > Given all that, I'm still confused. If we make the hid-google-hammer
> > > driver probe this device and the keyboard layout is vivaldi then we'd
> > > want the part of the vivaldi driver that exposes the
> > > function_row_physmap through sysfs. Otherwise userspace won't know how
> > > to handle the function row properly. I think we need the device to stack
> > > two drivers here. Does that happen with HID?
> >
> > As far as I know HID does not easily allow "stacking" drivers like that.
>
> Ok.
>
> >
> > Probably the easiest way would be to export vivaldi_feature_mapping()
> > and the show method for the physical row map and call them from the
> > hammer driver.
> >
>
> I worry about builtin vs. modular drivers so probably ought to make some

Just make hid-hammer depend on hid-vivaldi, hid-vivaldi is tiny
otherwise.

> hid-vivaldi-common.c file that has the physmap code and then have both
> drivers call that mini-library. The 'vivaldi_data' structure would need
> to be figured out too. The hammer driver stores 'hammer_kbd_leds' in the
> hid_get_drvdata() whereas the vivaldi driver stores 'vivalid_data' so we
> can't simply call the show method for the sysfs attribute without some
> minor surgery.

Yeah, we'll need to convert them into helpers into which callers can
pass buffers.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-14 22:41    [W:0.063 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site