Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Jan 2022 02:58:08 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/sgx: account backing pages |
| |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:55:43PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/14/22 3:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I can understand your hesitation, but I agree with Dave here that > >> wrapping the function makes the code more clear. I would prefer to keep > >> this the way it is. > > What if sgx_encl_get_backing() was changed as "static inline", if the > > only motivation is encapsulation? > > What would the purpose be of adding an 'inline' to the function definition?
Agreed, not much sense to do this. I just had troubles to get the way things were encapsulated before your response.
/Jarkko
| |