lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/17] ptrace/m68k: Stop open coding ptrace_report_syscall
    From
    Date
    Hi Geert,

    Am 12.01.2022 um 20:55 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
    > Hi Michael,
    >
    >> What's the other reason these patches are still stuck, Geert? Did we
    >> ever settle the dispute about what return code ought to abort a syscall
    >> (in the seccomp context)?
    >
    > IIRC, some (self)tests were still failing?

    Too true - but I don't think my way of building the testsuite was
    entirely according to the book. And I'm not sure I ran the testsuite
    with more than one of the return code options. In all honesty, I had
    been waiting for Adrian Glaubitz to test the patches with his seccomp
    library port instead of relying on the testsuite.

    Still, reason enough to split off the removal of syscall_trace() from
    the seccomp stuff if it helps with Eric's patch series.

    Cheers,

    Michael


    >
    > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
    >
    > Geert
    >
    > --
    > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
    >
    > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    > -- Linus Torvalds
    >

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-01-12 09:06    [W:4.128 / U:0.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site