Messages in this thread | | | From | "Chanho Park" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2 28/28] arm64: dts: exynos: use dedicated wake-up pinctrl compatible in ExynosAutov9 | Date | Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:28:56 +0900 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 5:17 AM > To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>; Sylwester Nawrocki > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>; Rob > Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>; Sam Protsenko > <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>; Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>; > Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@gmail.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 28/28] arm64: dts: exynos: use dedicated wake-up > pinctrl compatible in ExynosAutov9 > > Older Samsung Exynos SoC pin controller nodes (Exynos3250, Exynos4, > Exynos5, Exynos5433) with external wake-up interrupts, expected to have > one interrupt for multiplexing these wake-up interrupts. Also they > expected to have exactly one pin controller capable of external wake-up > interrupts. > > It seems however that newer ARMv8 Exynos SoC like Exynos850 and > ExynosAutov9 have differences: > 1. No multiplexed external wake-up interrupt, only direct, 2. More than > one pin controller capable of external wake-up interrupts. > > Use dedicated ExynosAutov9 compatible for its external wake-up interrupts > controller to indicate the differences. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> And you can also put Tested-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Best Regards, Chanho Park
| |