Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Baluta <> | Date | Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:20:51 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: dsp: fsl: Add DSP optional clocks documentation |
| |
> > The H/W block is controlled by the DSP firmware. So, we don't want > > to use the Linux kernel driver (thus the H/W block device tree node). > > 'status' is how you disable a device to not be used by the OS. > > The information about that device's resources are already in DT, we > don't need to duplicate that here. If you want a list of devices > assigned to the DSP here, that would be okay.
Thanks! This is a very good idea. I was thinking at a totally different thing.
So having something like this:
dsp {
hw-block-list = <&sai1>, <&sai2>;
}
And then inside the DSP driver we can get access to sai1 clocks. Do you know of any standard property name?
> > > The only thing that we cannot control from the DSP firmware are the clocks > > hence we handle them in the DSP node. > > > > We moved the DAI clocks under the DSP node as I think you suggested here: > > > > https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/969 > > No, that's certainly not what I was suggesting. The resources in the > DSP node should be the h/w resources of the DSP itself.
I see thanks!
| |