lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 17/24] x86/entry: Introduce struct ist_regs
From
Date


On 2021/9/1 01:50, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> struct ist_regs is the upmost stack frame for IST interrupt, it
> consists of struct pt_regs and other fields which will be added in
> later patch.
>
> Make vc_switch_off_ist() take ist_regs as its argument and it will switch
> the whole ist_regs if needed.
>
> Make the frame before calling paranoid_entry() and paranoid_exit() be
> struct ist_regs.
>
> This patch is prepared for converting paranoid_entry() and paranoid_exit()
> into C code which will need the additinal fields to store the results in
> paranoid_entry() and to use them in paranoid_exit().

This patch was over designed.

In ASM code, we can easily save results in the callee-saved registers.
For example, rc3 is saved in %r14, gsbase info is saved in %rbx.

And in C code, we can't save results in registers. And I thought there was
no place to save the results because the CR3 and gsbase are not kernel's.
So I extended the pt_regs to ist_regs to save the results.

But it was incorrect. The results can be saved in percpu data at the end of
paranoid_entry() after the CR3/gsbase are settled down. And the results
can be read at the beginning of paranoid_exit() before the CR3/gsbase are
switched to the interrupted context's.

sigh.

>
> The C interrupt handlers don't use struct ist_regs due to they don't need
> the additional fields in the struct ist_regs, and they still use pt_regs.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-10 03:07    [W:0.386 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site