lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] Cleanup MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
From


On 2021/9/29 15:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Kefeng,
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:35 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> Most ARCHs support SPARSE_IRQ, the dynamical and statical irq
>> description allocation are alternative.
>>
>> The last user of MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is sh/csky, but the sh use
>> SPARSE_IRQ, MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ could be kill. and for csky, it
>> uses statical allocation by default.
>>
>> So MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to be useless, no need to maintain a
>> separate MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ config, kill it.
>>
>> Also cleanup the kernel/irq/Kconfig a little.
>>
>> v2:
>> - drop all the NR_IRQS suggested by Geert
>> - don' use SPARSE_IRQ for csky by default, suggested by Guo.
>>
>> Kefeng Wang (3):
>> sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ
>> csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
>> genirq: Cleanup Kconfig
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> Tested on SH on landisk (real) and rts7751r2d (qemu), so
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks for your test.
>
> P.S. Please use the same version number in all patches of the series,
> to avoid confusing tools like b4.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929023522.57732-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang
> 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang
> 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] genirq: Cleanup Kconfig Kefeng Wang
> ^^
>
Strange, maybe some unexpected change in my local dir... sorry for the
confusing.

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-29 10:12    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog