Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:21:55 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Cleanup MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ |
| |
Hi Kefeng,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:35 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote: > Most ARCHs support SPARSE_IRQ, the dynamical and statical irq > description allocation are alternative. > > The last user of MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is sh/csky, but the sh use > SPARSE_IRQ, MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ could be kill. and for csky, it > uses statical allocation by default. > > So MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to be useless, no need to maintain a > separate MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ config, kill it. > > Also cleanup the kernel/irq/Kconfig a little. > > v2: > - drop all the NR_IRQS suggested by Geert > - don' use SPARSE_IRQ for csky by default, suggested by Guo. > > Kefeng Wang (3): > sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ > csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ > genirq: Cleanup Kconfig
Thanks for the update!
Tested on SH on landisk (real) and rts7751r2d (qemu), so Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
P.S. Please use the same version number in all patches of the series, to avoid confusing tools like b4.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929023522.57732-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/ 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang 2021-09-29 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] genirq: Cleanup Kconfig Kefeng Wang ^^
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |