lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.14 298/334] time: Handle negative seconds correctly in timespec64_to_ns()
From
Date
On 21/09/21 22:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 3) Maintainer allows AUTOSEL, but anything picked from files/subsystems
> without a stable tag requires an explicit ACK from the maintainer
> for the backport.
>
> Is new and I would be the first to opt-in:)
>
> My rationale for #3 is that even when being careful about stable tags,
> it happens that one is missing. Occasionaly AUTOSEL finds one of those
> in my subsystems which I appreciate.
>
> Does that make more sense now?

I like this!

> Might be a bit overbroad as it also includes x86/kvm, x86/xen, x86/pci
> which I'm not that involved with, but to make it simple for you, I just
> volunteered the relevant maintainers (CCed) to participate in that
> experiment.

I would opt in to MANUALSEL too; so Sasha, feel free to do the same for
everything that I'm involved in by the MAINTAINERS file, or we can start
with x86/kvm via the generic x86 entries.

Thanks,

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-22 08:21    [W:1.120 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site